NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Randwick City Council v Scarf [2011] NSWLEC 167 Hearing dates: 18 November 2010 Decision date: 23 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Craig J Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed 2. Appellant to pay the respondents' costs of the appeal Catchwords: APPEAL - s 56A Land and Environment Court Act 1979 - whether Commissioner's decision manifested error of law - whether Commissioner erred in application of the provisions of the State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - whether Commissioner failed to take into account the relevant provision of the Development Control Plan - no legal error demonstrated on the basis of appropriate consideration of the decision with reference to its form as an ex tempore judgment - challenge to decision involved as impermissible "fine toothcomb" approach - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Randwick Development Control Plan - Multi-Unit Housing Randwick Local Environmental Plan 1998 State Environmental Planning Policy No 1 - Development Standards Cases Cited: Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Limited (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Botany Bay City Council v Premier Customs Services Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 226; (2009) 172 LGERA 338 Brimbella Pty Ltd v Mosman Municipal Council (1985) 79 LGERA 367 Botany Bay City Council v Premier Customs Services Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 226; (2009) 172 LGERA 338 Fast Buck$ v Byron Shire Council (1999) 103 LGERA 94 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6; (1996) 185 CLR 259 North Sydney Municipal Council v Parlby (Land and Environment Court, 13 November 1986, unreported) Randall Pty Ltd v Willoughby City Council [2005] NSWCA 205; (2005) 144 LGERA 119 Scarf v Randwick City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1205 Segal v Waverley Council [2005] NSWCA 310; (2005) 64 NSWLR 177 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Tenacity Consulting v Warringah Council [2004] NSWLEC 140; (2004) 134 LGERA 23 Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827; (2007) 156 LGERA 446 Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167; (2001) 51 NSWLR 589 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Randwick City Council (Appellant) Dr Michael Scarf (First Respondent) Dr Charles Scarf (Second Respondent) Mrs Patricia Woods (Third Respondent) Representation: Mr P R Rigg (Solicitor) (Appellant) Mr A Galasso SC (Respondents) Norton Rose Australia (Appellant) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Respondents) File Number(s): 10587 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate