NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Matthews v Wear [2011] NSWSC 1145 Hearing dates: 19 September 2011 Decision date: 20 September 2011 Before: Associate Justice Macready Decision: I order the plaintiff receive a legacy of $150,000. Catchwords: WILLS AND ESTATES - family provision claim - relationship with the deceased - estrangement - relationship after 1962 was very limited and there was only ever one face to face meeting - financial resources and needs of claimant - claimant's was effectively to refurbish a new debt-free home which was not appropriate, however smaller provision made - nature and extent of estate - competing claims or interests Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 Cases Cited: Foley v Ellis [2008] NSWCA 288 McGrath v Eves [2005] NSWSC 2006 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Wentworth v Wentworth (NSWSC, 14 June 1991, unreported) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ian Kenneth Matthews (plaintiff) Thomas Stanley Wear - Estate of the Late Phyllis Marks (defendant) Representation: Mr D Liebhold for plaintiff Mr L Ellison SC for defendant Solicitors: Eddy Neumann for plaintiff Crane Paskins Law for defendant File Number(s): 2010/00065662
Judgment 1HIS HONOUR: This is an application under the Family Provision Act 1982 in respect of the estate of the late Phyllis May Marks who died on 5 September 2008 aged 94 years. She was survived by her adopted son, the plaintiff in the proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate