NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Dee Why Grand Shopping Centre Pty Limited v Dee Why Projects Pty Limited [2011] NSWSC 1149 Hearing dates: 21, 22, 23 September 2011 Decision date: 27 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: Specific performance ordered. See paragraph [25] Catchwords: CONTRACTS - construction - meaning of "sale" - meaning dependent on context - relevance of purpose of contractual provision CONTRACTS - agreement - uncertainty and incompleteness - whether essential terms agreed Cases Cited: Chan v Dainford Ltd (1985) 155 CLR 533 Fazzolari Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (2009) 237 CLR 603 Octra Nominees Pty Ltd v Chipper [2007] FCAFC 92 Seven Network (Operations) Limited v Warburton (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 386 Sun World Inc v Registrar, Plant Variety Rights (1997) 75 FCR 528 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dee Why Grand Shopping Centre Pty Ltd - plaintiff Dee Why Grand Projects Pty Ltd - first defendant Southern Cross Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd - second defendant Representation: Counsel: M G Rudge SC with N Manousaridis - for the plaintiff R Weber SC with Ms N Shaw - for the first defendant R McKeand SC with A Casselden - for the second defendant Solicitors: Colin Biggers & Paisley - for the plaintiff Mallesons Stephen Jaques - for the first defendant C V Theodore Solicitors - for the second defendant File Number(s): 2011/00200906
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate