NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Power Serve v Powerline's Clearing Group [2011] NSWSC 1180 Hearing dates: 28/09/2011 Decision date: 28 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Technology and Construction List Before: McDougall J Decision: Plaintiff's notice of motion dismissed with costs. Catchwords: BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION - Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) - whether adjudicator erred by concluding that s34 of the Act rendered void certain provisions of construction contract - nature of requirement to 'consider' pursuant to s22 (2) - no requirement for 'consideration' to lead to a legally or technically correct answer. Legislation Cited: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) Cases Cited: Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport (2004) 61 NSWLR 421 Chase Oyster Bar Pty Ltd v Hamo Industries Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 190 Clyde Bergemann v Varley Power [2011] NSWSC 1039 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Power Serve Pty Ltd (ACN 060 977 513) (Plaintiff) Powerline's Clearing Group Pty Limited (ACN 128 604 688) (First Defendant) Daniel Massey (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: F Corsaro SC (Plaintiff) J C Prowse (Solicitor) (First Defendant) Solicitors: Keystone Lawyers (Plaintiff) MCW Lawyers (First Defendant) Daniel Massey Solicitor and Consultant (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2011/309840
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate