NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barel v Segal (No 1) [2011] NSWSC 1181 Hearing dates: 4, 5 and 6 October 2011 Decision date: 19 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: See paragraphs [39] and [40] Catchwords: CONVEYANCING - operation of Conveyancing Act 1919 Section 66G(4), (5) and (6) - ambulatory and flexible - may proceed in stages CONVEYANCING - meaning of "more beneficial" in Section 66G(4) CONVEYANCING - sale or partition - whether sale a preferred remedy - no predisposition towards sale CONVEYANCING - contingent order for partition - implementation subject to grant of subdivision approval - order available in principle CONVEYANCING - consent of mortgagee - adjournment to allow evidence of consent CONVEYANCING - necessity of having determination of remaining issues including the respective contributions of each party to the acquisition of the land and the construction of the dwellings on it - relevant to what is "more beneficial" - relevant to any adjustment or equality money Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 Partition Act 1878 (NSW) Partition Act 1900 (NSW) Partition Act 1868 (UK) Strata Schemes (Freehold Development) Act 1973 Cases Cited: Asimus v Asimus [1999] NSWSC 1020 Cryer v Ossher [1997] NSWSC 613 Drinkwater v Ratcliffe (1875) LR 20 Eq 528 Fulton v 523 Nominees Pty. Ltd. [1984] VR 200 Gilbert v Smith (1879) 11 LR Ch D 78 Hayward v Skinner (1981) 1 NSWLR 590 Lucky Developments v Hsu [1999] NSWSC 412 Nullagine Investments Pty Limited v Western Australian Club Inc (1993) 177 CLR 635 Pannizutti v Trask (1987) 10 NSWLR 531 Pemberton v Barnes (1871) LR 6 Ch App 685 Re Cordingley (1948) 48 SR (NSW) 248 Re Darby (1999) 2 Qd R 350 Sovova v Ojvan (1987) 72 ACTR 10 Squire v Rogers (1979) 27 ALR 330 Texts Cited: Peter Butt, Land Law, 6th edition, 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Elie Barel - plaintiff Phillip Segal - defendant Representation: J Van Aalst - for the plaintiff G Carolan - for the defendant Coopers Lawyers - for the plaintiff Low Doherty & Stratford - for the defendant File Number(s): 2010/12807
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate