NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Carney v R; Cambey v R [2011] NSWCCA 223 Hearing dates: 22 September 2011 Decision date: 20 October 2011 Before: Whealy JA James J Hoeben J Decision: In each appeal, the appeal is allowed and the appellant is to have a new trial. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - murder - alternative verdict of manslaughter - joint trial - issue as to whether the accused were present - should manslaughter have been left to jury - miscarriage of justice - conduct of counsel in not asking manslaughter to be left.
CRIMINAL LAW - murder - alternative verdict of manslaughter - not left to jury - meaning of "open on the evidence" - evidence available to support verdict of manslaughter rather than murder - error of law - application of Rule 4, Criminal Appeal Rules - leave to appeal required - appellants lost real chance of being found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter.
CRIMINAL LAW - murder - alternative verdict of manslaughter - not left to jury - proviso to Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6 - test to be applied - nature of error to be taken into account - analysis of High Court decisions post Weiss v R. Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 ss 4, 6 Criminal Appeal Rules r 4 Cases Cited: R v Kanaan [2005] NSWCCA 385; 64 NSWLR 527 at [46], [99], [101] Gilbert v R [2000] HCA 15; 201 CLR 414 at 416-417 per Gleeson CJ and Gummow J, 434 per Callinan J Gillard v R [2003] HCA 64; 219 CLR 1 at 14-15 per Gleeson CJ and Callinan J, 15 per Gummow J, 34-35, 40 per Hayne J Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81; 224 CLR 300 at [35] - [36], [39] - [45] Pemble v R (1971) 124 CLR 107 per Barwick CJ at 117 - 118 R v Abusafiah (1991) 24 NSWLR 531 at 536 R v Wilson (2005) 62 NSWLR 346 at [20] DJS v R [2010] NSWCCA 200 RWB v R [2010] NSWCCA 147 Kessing v R [2008] NSWCCA 310; 73 NSWLR 22 Cesan v R [2008] HCA 52; 236 CLR 358 AK v State of Western Australia [2008] HCA 8; 232 CLR 438 Gassy v R [2008] HCA 18; 236 CLR 293 Vickers v R [2006] NSWCCA 60; 160 A Crim R 195 at [107] - [108] Darwiche v R [2011] NSWCCA 62 at [170] Carlton v R [2008] NSWCCA 244; 189 A Crim R 332 at 345 Darkan v R [2006] HCA 34; 227 CLR 373 Gassy v R [2008] HCA 18; 236 CLR 293 at [16] - [17] Green v R (1971) 126 CLR 28 at 34 Rafael Cesan v R [2008] HCA 52; 236 CLR 358 at [96] R v Nguyen [2010] HCA 38; 85 ALJR 8 at [50] Blackwell v R [2011] NSWCCA 93 at [50], [55] Category: Principal judgment Parties: Todd Carney (Firs Appellant) Luke Joseph Cambey (Second Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: S Odgers SC (First Appellent) S Hanely SC (Second Appellant) W J Abraham SC (Crown) Legal Aid Commission (First Appellant) O'Brien Solicitors (Second Appellant) Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2009/11701 2009/12114 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111 Citation: [2010] NSWSC 369 Date of Decision: 2010-04-30 00:00:00 Before: Fullerton J File Number(s): 2009/11701 2009/12114
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate