NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lahoud v Lahoud [2011] NSWSC 1186 Hearing dates: 7 October 2011 Decision date: 07 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Campbell JA Decision: Notice of Motion dismissed with costs Catchwords: COSTS - indemnity costs - offer of compromise - Calderbank letter - whether unreasonable for the offeree not to accept the offer of compromise - long history of disputation between parties - whether ambiguities in the offer that made it not unreasonable to fail to accept the offer Legislation Cited: Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 WLR 586 Commonwealth of Australia v Gretin [2008] NSWCA 717 Elite Protective Personnel Pty Ltd v Salmon [2007] NSWCA 322 Herning v GWS Machinery Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 375 Jones v Bradley (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 258 Joseph Lahoud v Victor Lahoud [2006] NSWSC 126 Lahoud v Lahoud [2011] NSWSC 994 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 SMEC Testing Services v Campbelltown [2000] NSWCA 323 Category: Costs Parties: Joseph Lahoud (Applicant) Victor Lahoud (Respondent) Representation: Counsel I M Neil SC (Applicant) S Philips (Respondent) Solicitors Verekers Lawyers (Applicant) McLachlan Thorpe Partners (Respondent) File Number(s): 2007/255809 Publication restriction: Nil Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9111
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate