NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: David Luis Montgomerie v Michelle Scott [2011] NSWDC 154 Hearing dates: 30, 31/05/2011; 1, 2, 3/06/2011; 10/06/2011 Decision date: 22 July 2011 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Norrish QC Decision: Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,372,486.27 plus interest of $35,261.00 being the total sum of $1,407,747.27. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs on the "ordinary basis" up and including 17 November 2010, on an indemnity basis from 18 November 2010 to the date. Catchwords: Negligence, damages, 'non-economic' loss, future economic loss. Legislation Cited: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Motor Accidents Compensation (Determination of Loss) Order 2010 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (2005) Cases Cited: Rabay v Bristow [2005] NSWCA 199 Magnou v AWTA Ltd [2007] NSWCA 35 Kallouf v Middis [2008] NSWCA 61 Donald v McKeown [2004] NSWCA 285 Malec v J C Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638 Norris v Blake [No 2] (1997) 41 NSWLR 49 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 R v Tang (2006) 161 A Crim R 377 F v The Queen (1995) 83 A Crim R 502 Penrith City Council v Parkes [2004] NSWCA 201 Nominal Defendant v Lane [2004] NSWCA 405 Magnou v AWTA Ltd [2007] NSWCA 357 Texts Cited: Freckleton, Selby Expert Evidence Thomson Law Book Company A History of Psychiatry John Wiley & Dons Inc 1997 Dr J Sydney Smith Brain damage - Medico-legal Aspects Blacktown Press Category: Principal judgment Parties: David Luis Montgomerie - Plaintiff Michelle Scott - Defendant Representation: Mr D Campbell SC/Mr D Toomey - Plaintiff Mr Rewell SC - Defendant Campbell Paton & Taylor - Plaintiff Moray & Agnew - Defendant File Number(s): 2008/321859
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate