NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Missingham v Shamin [2011] NSWSC 1208 Hearing dates: Wednesday, 28 September 2011 Decision date: 28 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: Brereton J Decision: Defendant by itself and its servants and agents restrained from disclosing terms of settlement except in specified circumstances. Catchwords: INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS - Plaintiff contends defendant in breach of confidentiality clause of deed entered into in settlement of defamation proceedings - strongly arguable defendant in breach by making of posts on internet forum - defendant contends relief should be refused as plaintiff lacks clean hands - not established court would decline final relief on this basis - assertion publication complained about in public domain as a result of pronouncements in Court proceedings - in public domain to limited extent entailing that confidentiality not lost - plaintiff has arguable case for final relief - balance of convenience favours grant of injunction as obligation of confidence would be completely defeated if injunction refused - no evidence of prejudice to be suffered by defendant - injunctory relief granted. Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Walter Patrick Missingham (plaintiff) Alex Shamin (defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Roche (plaintiff) Mr B Goldsmith (solicitor, defendant) Solicitors: Yeldham Price O'Brien Lusk (plaintiff) Goldsmiths Lawyers (defendant) File Number(s): 2011/305541
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate