NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: PAO v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney and Ors; BJH v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney and Ors; SBM v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney and Ors; IDF v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney and Ors; PMA v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney and Ors [2011] NSWSC 1216 Hearing dates: 22 August 2011 Decision date: 19 October 2011 Before: Hoeben J Decision: The appeal is allowed. The orders of Harrison AsJ of 4 May 2011 are set aside. In lieu thereof, the proceedings against the Applicant/Second Defendant in each matter is dismissed pursuant to Rule 13.4 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005. Catchwords: APPEAL - nature of appeal from Associate Justice to a single Judge - not a retrial - discretion exercised on wrong basis
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - applications by a defendant to strike out parts of statement of claim pursuant to UCPR 13.4(1) and 14.28(1) - whether Plaintiffs had arguable claim against Defendant - no evidence to establish Plaintiffs' case against Defendant - such evidence unlikely to be available in the future - whether principle in Wickstead and Ors v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 applicable Legislation Cited: Roman Catholic Church Trust Property Act 1936 (NSW) Supreme Court Act 1970 Civil Procedure Act 2005 Cases Cited: PAO v Grealy [2011] NSWSC 355 Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney v Ellis [2007] NSWCA 117; (2007) 70 NSWLR 565 Wickstead and Ors v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 Hartigan v International Krishna Consciousness [1999] NSWSC 139 Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Sakovits [2010] NSWSC 1322 Kady v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Sydney [1997] NSWCA 170 Connor v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Sydney [2006] NSWCCPD 124 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531 Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Limited (1981) 1 NSWLR 409 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) and Ors (1964) 112 CLR 125 Texts Cited: --- Category: Principal judgment Parties: PAO (Plaintiff) (2010/13389) Representation: Mr AJ Bartley; Ms L Whalan (Plaintiffs) Mr RG McHugh SC; Ms S Callan (Second Defendant) Porters Lawyers (Plaintiffs) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/13389; 2010/13435; 2010/13571; 2010/364831; 2010/365147 Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate