NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Styles v Clayton Utz (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1219 Hearing dates: Friday 7 October 2011 Decision date: 11 October 2011 Before: McCallum J Decision: Please note that these proceedings are presently listed for trial with a jury in February 2012. This judgment deals only with procedural matters. Plaintiff's application for leave further to amend her amended and consolidated statement of claim dismissed; paragraphs 41E(ix) and 44(a) of the amended and consolidated statement of claim struck out; plaintiff's application for orders setting aside three subpoenas addressed to former employers dismissed Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS - discrimination - sexual harassment - unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature - whether conduct alleged capable of amounting to conduct of a sexual nature in relation to the plaintiff
PROCEDURE - pleadings - application for further leave to amend - application to have parts of amended pleading struck out as being inconsistent with earlier leave
PROCEDURE - subpoenas - application to set aside Legislation Cited: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Styles v Clayton Utz [2011] NSWSC 1022 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Bridgette Styles (plaintiff) The partners of Clayton Utz listed in the schedule to the statement of claim (defendants) Representation: Plaintiff in person
S Dawson (defendants) Freehills (defendants) File Number(s): 2011/66430 Publication restriction: As to naming people referred to in argument in these proceedings, see judgment of McCallum J given 7 June 2011 and the non-publication order made that day as varied on 14 October 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate