NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2011] NSWLEC 1294 Hearing dates: 7 - 9 June 2011 Decision date: 14 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The application under s 96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify the consent for development application D/2009/702 for 20 Gadigal Avenue, Zetland is refused. 3. The exhibits, except Exhibit D, may be returned. Catchwords: APPEAL - amend condition of development consent to reduce the amount of monetary contribution. Whether the condition is unreasonable in the particular circumstances. Whether the use of a 'benchmark' date is reasonable to determine the nett demand for public amenities and services generated by the development. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: Arkibuilt Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2006) 67 NSWLR 529 Maygood v City of Sydney Council [2008] NSWLEC 1112 Meriton Apartments Pty Limited v South Sydney City Council (Unreported, NSWLEC 10412 of 2001, 12 September 2001) Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v City of Sydney [2009] NSWLEC 1336 Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2011] NSWCA 17 Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2010] NSWLEC 64 Rose Consulting Group v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2003) 58 NSWLR 159 Segal v Waverley Council (2005) 64 NSWLR 177 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate