NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: MONIS, Man Haron v R; DROUDIS, Amirah v R [2011] NSWCCA 231 Hearing dates: 23 August 2011 Decision date: 06 December 2011 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Allsop P at [70]; McClellan CJ at CL at [93] Decision: Appeals dismissed. Catchwords: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - constitutional challenge to validity of statute - whether s 471.12 Criminal Code infringes implied freedom of political communication - test in Lange v Australian Broadcasting Commission - whether section burdens freedom of communication about government or political matters - whether reasonably appropriate and adapted to serve legitimate end compatible with maintenance of system of government prescribed by the Constitution (Cth)
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - constitutional challenge to validity of statute - implied freedom of political communication - whether necessary to have regard to actual communication
CRIMINAL LAW - using a postal service to menace, harass or offend - constitutional validity of statutory offence - whether s 471.12 Criminal Code infringes implied freedom of political communication
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION - s 471.12 Criminal Code - meaning of "offensive" Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s 15A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code 1995 (Cth), s 470, s 471 Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Police Offences Act 1928 (Vic), s 25 Police Offences Ordinance 1930-1961 (ACT), s 17(d) Summary Offences Act 1988 Vagrants, Gaming and Other Offences Act 1931 (Qld), s 7(1)(d) Cases Cited: Anderson v Kynaston [1924] VLR 214 APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) [2005] HCA 44; (2005) 224 CLR 322 Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [1992] HCA 45; (1992) 177 CLR 106 Ball v McIntyre (1966) 9 FLR 237 Cohen v California 403 US 15 (1971) Coleman v Power [2004] HCA 39; (2004) 220 CLR 1 Cunliffe v The Commonwealth of Australia [1994] HCA 44; (1994) 182 CLR 272 Evans v Stevens (1791) 4 TR 224 Ex parte Collier (1877) 1 Knox (NSW) 513 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Applegate (1979) 38 FLR 1 Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Club Inc v Commissioner of Police [2008] HCA 4; (2008) 234 CLR 532 Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 44; (2011) 85 ALJR 398 Holland v The Queen [2005] WASCA 140 Inglis v Fish [1961] VR 607 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1997] HCA 25; (1997) 189 CLR 520 Lend Lease Real Estate Investments Ltd v GPT RE Ltd [2006] NSWCA 207 Levy v State of Victoria [1997] HCA 32; (1997) 189 CLR 579 Melser v Police [1967] NZLR 437 Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission [2004] HCA 41; (2004) 220 CLR 181 Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills [1992] HCA 46; 177 CLR 1 New South Wales v The Commonwealth [2006] HCA 52; 229 CLR 1 Plaintiff S157/2002 v The Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2; 211 CLR 476 R v Burgmann (Court of Criminal Appeal, 4 May 1973, unreported) R v Smith (1974) 2 NSWLR 586 Roberts v Bass [2002] HCA 57; (2002) 212 CLR 1 Rowan v United States Post Office Department 397 US 728 (1970) Sellers v Bishop (1905) 11 ALR (CN) 61 Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd [1994] HCA 46; (1994) 182 CLR 104 Windred v Manion (1918) 14 Tas LR 36 Worcester v Smith [1951] VLR 316 Texts Cited: D C Pearce and R S Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (7th Ed, 2011) F C Hutley 'Insulting Words' (1941) 14 ALJ 384 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Man Haron Monis (First Appellant) Amirah Droudis (Second Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Attorney General (NSW) (Intervening) Representation: Counsel G O'L Reynolds / G R Rubagotti (First Appellant) D M J Bennett QC / S E Grant (Second Appellant) J Agius SC / M McHugh (Respondent) M G Secton SC SG / J G Renwick (on behalf of the Attorney General) Solicitors Sydney Defense Lawyers (First Appellant) Ford Criminal Lawyers (Second Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Solicitor General (Attorney General) File Number(s): 2009/00236443 2010/260817 Decision under appeal Citation: R v Monis; R v Droudis [2011] NSWDC 39 Date of Decision: 2011-04-18 00:00:00 Before: Tupman DCJ File Number(s): 2009/00236443 2010/260817
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate