NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Cantwell v Sinclair [2011] NSWSC 1244 Hearing dates: 04/04/2011, 05/04/2011, 06/04/2011, 07/04/2011, 11/04/2011, 12/04/2011 Decision date: 25 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Rothman J Decision: (i) Judgment for the plaintiff; (ii) The defendant shall pay damages in the sum of $77,750 (including interest) to the plaintiff; (iii) Within seven days of the date hereof, the plaintiff shall file and serve a document setting out its claim for any order as to costs and within a further seven days thereafter the defendant shall respond thereto. If there be no agreement, the Court shall contact the parties in order to direct written submissions and/or a short hearing on costs. Catchwords: DEFAMATION - defamatory imputations conveyed by email - qualified privilege - occasion of qualified privilege - two alternative bases - each destroyed by improper motive - damages awarded Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 Cases Cited: Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Limited [2010] HCA 25; (2010) 241 CLR 79 Ali v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 183 Amalgamated Televisions Services v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158 Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 5; (2004) 218 CLR 366 Bellino v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1996] HCA 47; (1996) 185 CLR 183 Bennette v Cohen [2009] NSWCA 60 Brett HOLMES v Andrew FRASER [2008] NSWSC 570 Cush v Dillon and Boland v Dillon [2009] NSWDC 21 Cush v Dillon; Boland v Dillon [2011] HCA 30; (2011) 85 ALJR 865 Goyan v Motyka [2008] NSWCA 28 Guise v Kouvelis [1947] HCA 13; (1947) 74 CLR 102 Haddon v Forsyth [2011] NSWSC 123 Higgins v Sinclair [2011] NSWSC 163 Holmes a Court v Papaconstuntinos [2011] NSWCA 59 Manefield v Child Care NSW [2010] NSWSC 1420 Megna v Marshall [2010] NSWSC 686 Papaconstuntinos v Holmes a Court [2009] NSWSC 903 Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton [2009] HCA 16; (2009) 238 CLR 460 Reader's Digest Services Pty Ltd v Lamb [1982] HCA 4; (1982) 150 CLR 500 Roberts v Bass [2002] HCA 57; (2002) 212 CLR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Melanie Cantwell (Plaintiff) Douglas Sinclair (Defendant) Representation: Counsel:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate