NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Visnic v Sywak [2011] NSWSC 1246 Hearing dates: 10, 17 October 2011 Decision date: 21 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Corporations List Before: Barrett J Decision: Matter to be listed for further directions Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - winding up - winding up by the court - debts and claims satisfied in full - surplus in liquidator's hands - who is entitled to surplus - trustee in bankruptcy of shareholder is on the register - wife of that shareholder has interest in shares under Family Court order - two financiers with whom the shareholder dealt claim equitable interests - former lawyers of the shareholder claim fruits of the action lien - whether equitable interests in shares cognisable when deciding entitlements to surplus - whether surplus should be paid into court - pending applications by liquidator, one financier and the former lawyers - whether these should be cross-vested to the Federal Court - further submissions required on regime to allow liquidator to play minimal role and to determine the conflicting claims to surplus Legislation Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), s 133 Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 27(1), 58(3) Companies Act 1862 (Eng), s 109 Companies (New South Wales) Code, Table A, Schedule 3 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Part 9.7, ss 9, 140(1), 169, 468A, 479(3), 485, 488, 501, 543(1), 1072E(10), 1337H Corporations Law of New South Wales, Table A, Schedule 1, regulation 6 Corporations Regulations 2001 (Cth), regulations 5.6.71, 5.6.72 Supreme Court (Corporations) Rules 1999, rule 7.10 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Part 41, rule 25.3(3) Cases Cited: Binney v The Ince Hall Coal and Cannel Co (1866) 35 LJ Ch 363 Bluebottle UK Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2007] HCA 54; (2007) 232 CLR 598 Bradford Banking Co v Briggs (1886) 12 App Cas 29 Cheney v Spooner [1929] HCA 12; (1929) 41 CLR 532 Ilhan v Cvitanovic [2009] NSWSC 160; (2009) 73 NSWLR 644 Re Doran Constructions Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 215; (2002) 194 ALR 101 Re Hogg Robinson & Co Pty Ltd [1933] VR 416 Re J Earle Hermann Ltd (1914) 14 SR (NSW) 397 Re Klaus Maertin Pty Ltd; Maertin v Klaus Maertin Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 618; (2009) 232 FLR 239 Re Paragon Holdings Ltd [1961] Ch 346 Re Perkins (1890) 24 QBD 613 Re Phoenix Oil and Transport Co Ltd (No 2) [1958] Ch 565 Re The Australian Gold Mining Co [1877] WN 37 Re The Mount Dundas and Zeehan Railway Co Ltd (1900) 26 VLR 197 Re Weston; Employers Mutual Indemnity (Workers Compensation) Ltd v Omni Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 264; (2009) 255 ALR 362 Visnic v Sywak [2007] NSWSC 701 Texts Cited: M G R Gronow, "McPherson's Law of Company Liquidation", 5th edition (looseleaf) Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Michael Gregory Jones (Liquidator) - Applicant Peter Orest Sywak (First Defendant) - by leave Maxwell William Prentice (Bankruptcy Trustee of Milan Visnic) - by leave John David Latimer Fabian & Ors (lien claimants) - by leave Quickfund Capital Pty Ltd - by leave Representation: Mr T C Russell - Applicant Ms C J Grygiel - Peter Orest Sywak Mr J T Johnson - Maxwell William Prentice Ms R Wong - John David Latimer Fabian & Ors Mr D A Allen - Quickfund Capital Pty Ltd ERA Legal - Applicant Polczynski Lawyers - Peter Orest Sywak Sally Nash & Co - Maxwell William Prentice Lander & Rogers - John David Latimer Fabian & Ors Hancocks Solicitors - Quickfund Capital Pty Ltd File Number(s): 2001/00082389
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate