NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barescape Pty Ltd & Anor v Bacchus Holdings Pty Ltd & Anor (No 4) [2011] NSWSC 1269 Hearing dates: 9 to 12 August and 15 to 18 August 2011, 6 to 9 September 2011, 13 to 16 September 2011 Decision date: 14 September 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Black J Decision: Leave granted on terms for Cross-Claimant to call additional witness whose affidavit was not served in accordance with Court's directions Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Leave to call additional witness whose affidavit was not served in accordance with Court's directions Legislation Cited: - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 31.28(4) - Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 56-61 - Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Cases Cited: - Mobile Innovations Ltd v Vodafone Pacific Ltd [2003] NSWSC 309 - Jones v Dunkel (1959) CLR 298 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Barescape Pty Ltd atf The Vs Family Trust (First Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant) Anthony Ventura (Second Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Midfielder Pty Ltd (Third Cross-Defendant) Bacchus Holdings Pty Ltd atf The Bacchus Holdings Trust (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Matthew Gordon Higgins (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: R.J. Burbidge QC, C.D. Wood (Plaintiffs/ Cross-Defendants) J.C. Kelly SC, A.A. Henskens, N.E. Furlan (Defendants/Cross-Claimant) Solicitors: Hicksons (Plaintiffs/Cross-Defendants) Bilbie Dan (Defendants/Cross-Claimant) File Number(s): 09/291437
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate