NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AM v R [2011] NSWCCA 237 Hearing dates: 10 October 2011 Decision date: 03 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: McClellan CJ at CL at 1 Latham J at 2 Harrison J at 3 Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - sexual assault - Crimes Act 1900 ss 61I and 61L - whether miscarriage of justice - whether trial judge erred in directing jury on question of whether appellant was reckless as to complainant's consent to sexual intercourse - whether jury verdict was unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(1) - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Cases Cited: Banditt v The Queen [2005] HCA 80; (2005) 224 CLR 262 Kurdi v R [2011] NSWCCA 179 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Henning (NSWCCA 11 May 1990, unreported) R v Kitchener (1993) 29 NSWLR 696 SKA v The Queen (2011) HCA 13 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AM (Appellant) Crown (Respondent) Representation: S Stanton (Appellant) J Girdham (Respondent) Cater and Blumer Solicitors S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) File Number(s): 2008/12780 Publication restriction: Appellant to be referred to by pseudonym Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2010-07-27 00:00:00 Before: Sweeney DCJ File Number(s): 2008/12780
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate