NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: RILEY v R [2011] NSWCCA 238 Hearing dates: 31 May 2011 Decision date: 14 September 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Hoeben J at [165] Grove AJ at [166] Decision: 1. Appeal upheld. 2. Quash the conviction in relation to counts 1, 4 and 7 and order that verdicts of acquittal be entered with respect to those counts. Catchwords: CRIMINAL APPEAL - provision of drugs to a person who dies or falls ill - meaning of cause a person to take a drug - insufficient evidence to constitute tendency - unreasonable verdicts - appeal upheld - convictions quashed and acquittals ordered. Legislation Cited: Offences Against the Person Act 1861 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act Cases Cited: Em v R [2006] NSWCCA 336 Em v The Queen (2007) 232 CLR 67 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 O'Sullivan v Truth & Sportsman Ltd (1957) 96 CLR 220 R v Burns [2011] NSWCCA 56. R v Em [2003] NSWCCA 374 R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306 R v Kennedy (No. 2) [2008] 1 AC 269 R v Moffatt [2000] NSWCCA 174; (2000) 112 A Crim R 201 R v Nelson [2004] NSWCCA 231 R v PL [2009] NSWCCA 256 R v SJRC [2007] NSWCCA 142 R v Wilhelm [2010] NSWSC 334; 200 A Crim R 413 SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Smale v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 328 Vickers v The Queen [2006] NSWCCA 60 Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531 Texts Cited: 3rd ed. of Halsbury's Laws of England Category: Principal judgment Parties: Daniel Charles Riley (appellant) The Crown Representation: T Molomby SC/Tony Evers (appellant) D Arnott SC (Crown) M A Douglass (appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) File Number(s): 2008/1881 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2009-12-17 00:00:00 Before: Blackmore DCJ File Number(s): 2008/11/1246
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate