NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: IceTV v Duncan Ross & Ors [2011] NSWSC 1300 Hearing dates: Thursday, 27 October 2011 Decision date: 27 October 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Brereton J Decision: Judgment debt be paid by instalments. Notice to produce set aside. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Instalment orders - defendants seek judgment debt be paid in instalments - discussion of law as to instalment orders - such orders ought not be made where judgment debtor's means sufficient to pay debt in full immediately - such orders ought not be made if would be futile due to impecuniosity of debtor - time for payment ought not be unreasonable - instalment order must result in net reduction of judgment debt, bearing in mind interest accrues on such debts - defendants means do not enable them to immediately pay judgment debt - legitimate public interest in allowing defendants to continue performing work - order made enables net reduction of judgment debt. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Notices to produce - plaintiff seeks to have defendants' notice set aside - notice pertains to plaintiff's application for strike out or summary dismissal of defendants' cross-claim on basis of legal untenability of cross-claim - Court assumes factual allegations can be proved in such applications - defendants' contention two companies "one and the same" legally impossible - notice to produce set aside. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Civil Procedure Act, 2005, s 107 (NSW) Conveyancing Act, 1919, s 37A (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, r 21, r 37 Cases Cited: Cahill v Howe [1986] VR 63 Hellier Capital Pty Ltd v Albarran [2009] NSWSC 403 IceTV Pty Ltd v Ross [2009] NSWSC 980 Leondaris v KGB Design & Construction Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1354 Scottish Co-Operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer and Another [1958] 3 All ER 66 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: IceTV Pty Ltd (plaintiff) Duncan Ross (first defendant) Dr Peter Vogel (second defendant) Vogel Ross Pty Ltd (third defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr J.M. Ireland QC with Mr J.S. Cooke (plaintiff) Mr D Ross and Dr P Vogel appeared in person for the defendants Solicitors: Argyle Lawyers (plaintiff) File Number(s): 2007/254759
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate