NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Ashleigh Developments Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADT 250 Hearing dates: 4 August 2010, 15 and 16 November 2010, 10, 11, 15, 16 and 17 March 2011, 3 May 2011 Decision date: 02 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: S Frost, Judicial Member Decision: Assessments of land tax for 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 confirmed. Catchwords: Land tax - primary production use of land - "dominant use" of land - physical activity on the land undertaken by a person other than the owner of the land - whether "dominant use" is measured only by reference to physical activities conducted "on" the land - whether the primary production use of the land has a "significant and substantial commercial purpose or character" - whether the primary production use of the land is engaged in "for the purpose of profit on a continuous or repetitive basis" Legislation Cited: Land Tax Management Act 1956 Cases Cited: Council of the City of Newcastle v Royal Newcastle Hospital (1957) 96 CLR 493; Sonter v Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1976) 7 ATR 30; Greenville Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1977) 7 ATR 278; Nancy Shetland Pty Ltd v The Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works (1974) 48 ALJR 448; Saville v Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1980) 81 ATC 4373; Abbott v Commissioner of Land Tax [1979] VR 297; Australian Football League v Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] VCAT 1882; Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act v NSW Aboriginal Land Council [2008] HCA 48; Reysson Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADTAP 17; Cornish Group Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2009] NSWADT 191; Leda Manorstead v Chief Commissioner [2010] NSWSC 867; Thomas v FCT (1972) 3 ATR 165; Hope v Bathurst City Council (No. 3) [1994] NSWCA 139 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ashleigh Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant) and Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel A H Rider (Applicant) I S Young (Respondent) Hicksons Lawyers (Applicant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 096105
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate