NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Duncan v State of Western Australia [2011] NSWSC 1320 Hearing dates: 14 October 2011 Decision date: 04 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walmsley AJ Decision: (1) Notice of Motion dismissed (2) Applicant to pay the respondent's costs Catchwords: CROSS-VESTING - interests of justice - application dismissed Legislation Cited: Child Welfare Act 1947 (WA) Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 (WA) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) Cases Cited: BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz [2004] HCA 61; (2004) 221 CLR 400 Ewins v BHP Billiton Limited [2005] VSC 4 James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry [2000] NSWCA 353; (2000) 50 NSWLR 357 Lend Lease Property Management and Construction Pty Ltd v National Fire Solutions Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 739 Rosenboom v Qantas Airways Ltd [2002] NSWSC 792; (2002) 56 NSWLR 164 Taurus Funds Management Pty Ltd v Aurox Resources Ltd [2010] NSWSC 1223 Sugar Australia Ltd v Conneq [2011] NSWSC 805 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: The State Western Australia (Applicant, defendant) Lee-Anne Marie Duncan (Respondent, plaintiff) Representation: B Allen (Applicant, defendant) J Cairn (Respondent, plaintiff) State Solicitor's Office (Western Australia) (Applicant, defendant) Herbert Weller (Respondent, plaintiff) File Number(s): 2010/ 365324
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate