NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Andrew Iskandar & R v Nita Iskandar (No. 3) [2011] NSWSC 1344 Hearing dates: 1 November 2011 Decision date: 01 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Davies J Decision: The evidence is admissible Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: The Crown Andrew Iskandar (Accused) Nita Iskandar (Accused) Representation: Ms K Shead (Crown Prosecutor) Mr J O'Sullivan (Andrew Iskandar) Mr D G Price (Nita Iskandar) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Nyman Gibson Stewart (Andrew Iskandar) Archbold Legal (Nita Iskandar) File Number(s): 2010/49007 & 2010/49279 Publication restriction: Publication restricted to the parties
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 27 June 2012
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate