NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Romascu v Manolache [2011] NSWSC 1362 Hearing dates: 9, 10 November 2011 Decision date: 12 December 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Probate List Before: Hallen AsJ Decision: Order that: (a) Letters of administration with the deceased's Will made on 6 May 2009 annexed in solemn form be granted to the Plaintiff; (b) The matter be referred to the Registrar to complete the grant; (c) The Cross-Claim be dismissed; (d) If the parties are unable to agree on the burden of costs, the matter is adjourned for argument; (e) With the exception of each original Will, the exhibits should be dealt with in accordance with the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and the Court Books may be returned. Catchwords: The deceased made two wills during her lifetime, the first in May 2009 and the last in December 2009 - No dispute that the May Will was duly executed and otherwise valid - Sole issue whether December Will valid and should be admitted to probate - If valid, it revoked the May Will - Central questions concerning the validity of the December Will, are whether the deceased validly executed that Will; whether she had testamentary capacity and whether the deceased knew and approved of the December Will - Undue influence also alleged but not relied upon at the hearing Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 Succession Act 2006 Supreme Court Rules 1970 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Alvaro, In the Estate of; (deceased); Public Trustee v Alvaro (1995) 182 LSJS 383; [1995] SASC 5183 Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558 Banks v Goodfellow [1870] LR 5 QB 549 Battan Singh v Amirchand [1948] AC 161 Bool v Bool [1941] St R Qd 26 Boughton v Knight (1873) LR3 P&D 64 Brown v Wade [2010] WASC 367 Bull v Fulton (1942) 66 CLR 295 England, In the Will of (1900) 22 ALT 86 Edwards v Boyd (1958) 75 WN (NSW) 525 Fradgley v Pocklington (No 2) [2011] QSC 355 Friesen and Holmberg v Friesen Estate (1985) 33 Man R (2d) 98 Frizzo v Frizzo [2011] QCA 308 Griffith, Re; Easter v Griffith (1995) 217 ALR 284 Hodges, Re; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698 Hoff v Atherton [2005] WTLR 99 Jolley v Jarvis [1964] P 262 In the Estate of Kirs (1990) 55 SASR 61 Key v Key [2010] EWHC 408; [2010] All ER 155 King v Hudson [2009] NSWSC 1013 Kovacs v Public Trustee [2006] SASC 1 Kuhl v Liebcheschel [1933] SASR 394 Levy, Re [1953] VLR 652 Manning v Hughes; Estate of Ludewig [2010] NSWSC 226 Munn, In re [1943] SASR 304 Nicholson v Knaggs [2009] VSC 64 Nock v Austin (1918) 25 CLR 519 Oakes v Uzzell [1932] Osborne v Smith [1960] HCA 89; (1960) 105 CLR 153 Palin v Ponting [1930] P 185 Parton v Johnson (1868) LR 1 P and D 549 Pates v Craig; The Estate of Cole (NSWSC, 28 August, 1995, unreported) Perrins v Holland [2009] EWHC 1945 Petrovski v Nasev; The Estate of Janakievska [2011] NSWSC 1275 Richardson v Rearden [2006] NSWSC 1252 R, In re (dec'd) [1950] 2 All ER 117 Sharp v Adam [2006] WTLR 1059 Smith v Tebbitt (1867) L.R. 1 P&D 398 Tsagouris v Bellairs [2010] SASC 147 Vernon v Watson; Estate Clarice Isabel Quigley dec'd [2002] NSWSC 600 Virginie-Pitel v Campbell; Campbell v Virginie-Pitel [2010] NSWSC 1440 Young v Holloway [1895] P 87 Texts Cited: Hardingham IJ, Neave MA and Ford HAJ, Wills and Intestacy in Australia and New Zealand (2nd ed) (1989) Jarman on Wills, London, Sweet and Maxwell, 8th ed, 1951, Vol. 3 K Laster & V Taylor, Interpreters & the Legal System (1994), 120 referred to in Barnett, Michael, "Mind Your Language - Interpreters in Australian Immigration Proceedings" [2006] UWSLawRw 5; (2006) 10(1), University of Western Sydney Law Review 109 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Florin Adrian Romascu (Plaintiff) Elena Manolache (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff appeared in person Mr P R Glissan (Defendant) Counsel: Plaintiff appeared in person John McEncroe & Company (Defendant) File Number(s): 2010/272586
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate