NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McCallum v Sandercock (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 203 Hearing dates: 10 November 2011 Decision date: 10 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 4 Before: Pepper J Decision: 1. relief as ordered; and 2. respondents to pay 60% of the applicant's costs Catchwords: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT: appropriate relief to be granted pursuant to a finding of water pollution, air pollution and noise pollution
COSTS: whether proceedings brought in the public interest - whether costs should be apportioned - applicant was successful in one of three 'events' and abandoned a fourth ground of relief shortly before the hearing commenced - proceedings not brought in the public interest - costs apportioned Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 s 98 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 r 4.2 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 ss 139, 140 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 42.1 Cases Cited: Australians for Sustainable Development Inc v Minister for Planning (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 70 Caroona Coal Action Group Inc v Coal Mines Australia Pty Limited and Minister for Mineral Resources (No 3) [2010] NSWLEC 59; (2010) 173 LGERA 280 Delta Electricity v Blue Mountains Conservation Society Inc [2010] NSWCA 263; (2010) 176 LGERA 424 Dodds Family Investments Pty Ltd v Lane Industries Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 259; (1993) 26 IPR 261 F & D Bonaccorso Pty Ltd v City of Canada Bay Council (No 5) [2008] NSWLEC 235 Friends of Turramurra Inc v Minister for Planning (No 2) [2011] NSWLEC 170 Hastings Point Progress Association v Tweed Shire Council (No 3) (2010) 172 LGERA157; [2010] NSWCA 39 James v Surf Road Nominees Pty Ltd (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 296 Martin v New South Wales Minister for Mineral and Forest Resources [2011] NSWLEC 38 McCallum v Sandercock [2011] NSWLEC 175 McGinn v Ashfield Council [2011] NSWLEC 105 Olofsson v Minister for Primary Industries [2011] NSWLEC 137 Snowy River Alliance Inc v Water Administration Ministerial Corporation [2011] NSWSC 1132 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Beryl A McCallum (Applicant) Raymond J Sandercock (First Respondent) Wendy Sandercock (Second Respondent) Representation: Mr F G Kalyk (Applicant) Ms F J Berglund (First and Second Respondents) Hynes & McCormack (Applicant) Russell J Baxter (First and Second Respondents) File Number(s): 40042 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate