NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Whitfield v State of NSW (NSW Police Force) [2011] NSWADT 265 Hearing dates: 22 and 23 August 2011 Decision date: 15 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Equal Opportunity Division Before: Magistrate N Hennessy, Dr J Schneeweiss Mr M Nasir Decision: (1)The applicant's complaint of age discrimination is substantiated. (2)The respondent is to pay the applicant $10,000 in damages. Catchwords: DISCRIMINATION - age discrimination in the provision of services - characteristics of age - whether police providing services to alleged perpetrator - causation - Legislation Cited: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 Police Act 1990 Cases Cited: Commissioner of Police v Mohamed [2009] NSWCA 432 Waters v Public Transport Corporation [1992] HCA 49; 173 CLR 349 Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Service v Estate of Edward John Russell [2001] NSWSC 475 IW v City of Perth [1997] HCA 30; 191 CLR 1 Farah v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1997] 1 All ER 289 Gichura v Home Office [2008] EWCA Civ 697 Savjani v IRC [1981] QB 458 Hall v Sheiban Pty Ltd [1989] FCA 72; [1988-89] 85 ALR 503 at [73]; Haines v Bendall [1991] HCA 15; (1990) 172 CLR 60 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Keith Whitfield (Applicant) State of NSW (NSW Police Force) (Respondent) Representation: Counsel N Poynder (Applicant) M Seck (Respondent) Legal Aid Commission (Applicant) Henry Davis York, Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 101068
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate