NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Paycorp Payment Solutions Pty Ltd & Anor v Peter Singyin Chai & Anor (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1400 Hearing dates: 10, 14, 20 October 2011 Decision date: 22 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Brereton J Decision: Declare that pursuant to the share purchase agreement PCI Corp acquired all the shares in the first plaintiff upon the trusts contained in the Deed of Settlement dated 1 March 2010. Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Whether second defendant acquired shares in first plaintiff as trustee of a trust the beneficiary and appointor of which was the controlling mind of the plaintiff companies - first defendant as director of second defendant said to have executed trust deed - first defendant disputes he executed trust deed - issues of fact and credit - where both protagonists unreliable, significant weight given to documentary record, source and application of funds, and commerciality - more probable explanation second defendant acquired shares as trustee of trust of which controlling mind of plaintiffs was beneficiary and appointor. TRUSTS - Whether second defendant validly and effectively replaced by second plaintiff as trustee of trust - controlling mind of plaintiff companies fabricates first defendant's resignation as director and purports to have second defendant resign as trustee - controlling mind of plaintiff companies not sole director and secretary and purported resignation ineffectual - pursuant to trust deed controlling mind of plaintiff as appointor had power to remove and replace trustee - instrument of replacement supportable by that power - second plaintiff validly and effectively appointed trustee. Legislation Cited: (CTH) Corporations Act 2000, s 1308 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900, s 253, s 254 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paycorp Payment Solutions Pty Limited (first plaintiff) Calcom Enterprises Pty Limited (second plaintiff) Peter Singyin Chai (first defendant) PCI Corporation Pty Limited (second defendant) Representation: Counsel: G A Sirtes SC with J A Arnott (plaintiffs) B F Katekar (defendant) Solicitors: Whittens Lawyers & Consultants (plaintiffs) O'Neill Partners (defendants) File Number(s): 2011/74065
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate