NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Khalil v The Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADT 276 Hearing dates: 7 November 2011 Decision date: 22 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: A Verick, Judicial Member Decision: 1. The decision and assessment requiring the applicant to repay the Chief Commissioner the $14,000 first home owner grant is affirmed. 2. The penalty of 60% ($8,400) imposed in the assessment to recover the grant is reduced to 20% ($2,800). 3. The decision and assessment to recover the duty of $11,242 payable on the transfer with interest ($568.03) is affirmed. 4. The penalty tax assessed at 60% ($8,430) to recover the duty on the transfer is remitted in full. Catchwords: First Home Owner Grant and First Home Plus Concession - residence requirement Legislation Cited: First Home Owner Grant Act 2000 Duties Act 1997 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Land Tax Management Act 1956 Cases Cited: Deverich v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADT 268 Bates v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] NSWADT 13 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Ferrington (GD) [2004] NSWADTAP 41 Zakariya v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] NSWADT 26 City of Heidelberg v The Baptist Union of Victoria and Anor. (1974) 34 LGRA 328 Radaich v Smith (1959) 101 CLR 209 Stuart v Marshall (1958) 75 WN (NSW) 252 Lewis v Bell (1985) 1 NSWLR 731 Commissioner of Land Tax v Christie [1973] 2 NSWLR 526 R v St Pancras Assessment Committee [1877] 2 Q.B.D. 581 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Mesiti [2003] NSWADTAP 57 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Aldridge & Anor [2003] NSWADTAP 50 Flaracos v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2003] NSWSC 68 Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B&S 826 Philpott v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (RD) [2008] NSWADTAP 18 Chief Commissioner of State Revenue v Incise Technologies Pty Ltd & Anor. [2004] NSWADTAP 19 Trust Co. of Australia v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2002] NSWADT 21 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ali Khalil (Applicant) The Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel D Tynan (Applicant) Fay Rose Legal (Applicant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 106101
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate