NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Tarres v Rozelle Carriers Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 1410 Hearing dates: 14/03/2011, 15/03/2011, 16/03/2011, 17/03/2011,18/03/2011 Decision date: 25 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Garling J Decision: (1) Judgment for plaintiff in a sum to be calculated. (2) Parties to bring in short minutes of order. (3) Proceedings adjourned to 9.30am Friday 9 December 2011, for argument and final orders. Catchwords: TORTS - NEGLIGENCE - Motor vehicle accident - Truck collides with bridge superstructure - Truck driver's lap-only seatbelt did not lock during collision - Serious neck injury sustained - Breach of duty for failure to replace faulty seatbelt - Defendants had knowledge of fault - Failure to provide lap-sash seatbelt not breach of duty - Operational seatbelt would have prevented injuries
TORTS - CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE - Truck collides bridge superstructure - Motor Accidents Act 1988 s 74(2) does not apply - Plaintiff knew height of bridge - Plaintiff did not measure height of container on truck - Plaintiff did not know extent of truck's weight change after unloading container's contents - Plaintiff relied on signal from oncoming motorist to assess if truck would fit under bridge - Plaintiff did not take available alternative path - Thirty-five percent apportionment just and equitable
DAMAGES - Motor vehicle accident - Serious cervical spinal injury requiring surgical decompression and fusion - Greater than ten per cent whole body impairment - Plaintiff overstating extent of pain and disability - Mobile with difficulty on occasions - No longer able to drive heavy motor vehicles - Twenty per cent residual earning capacity - Future economic loss reduced for vicissitudes of life - Future treatment expenses adjusted for reduced necessity of psychological care - No issue of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 Motor Accidents Act 1988 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 Workers Compensation Act 1987 Cases Cited: Barnes v Hay (1988) 12 NSWLR 337 Council of the Shire of Wyong v Shirt [1980] HCA 12; (1980) 146 CLR 40 Fox v Wood [1981] HCA 41; (1981) 148 CLR 438 Hodgson v Crane [2002] NSWCA 276; (2002) 55 NSWLR 199 Joslyn v Berryman [2003] HCA 34; (2003) 214 CLR 552 Kallouf v Middis [2008] NSWCA 61 March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12; (1991) 171 CLR 506 Nominal Defendant v Livaja [2011] NSWCA 121 Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALJR 492 Roads and Traffic Authority v Royal [2008] HCA 19 Swain v Waverley Municipal Council [2005] HCA 4; (2005) 220 CLR 517 Category: Principal judgment Parties: William Tarres (P) Rozelle Carriers Pty Ltd (D1) Hobbs Bros (Carriers) Pty Ltd (D2) Allianz Australia Insurance Limited (D3) Representation: L King SC, A McSpedden (P) J Gracie (D1-D2 on 14.03.11) K Rewell SC, G Smith (D1-2 on 15.03.11 – 18.03.11; D3) Napier Keen (P) Riley Gray-Spencer Lawyers (D1-D2) TLlawyers (D3) File Number(s): SC 2009/332335 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate