NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Australia Pty Limited v State of New South Wales & Anor [2011] NSWSC 1458 Decision date: 30 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: White J Decision: Refer to para [108] of judgment. Catchwords: SALE OF GOODS - mercantile agent - agent put in possession of vehicle and authorised to sell - agent's employee sold vehicle to financier and entered into hire purchase agreement for his own benefit - agent did not have actual authority to sell vehicle - whether purchaser obtained title pursuant to s 5(1) Factors (Mercantile Agents) Act 1923 - whether sale made by agent in ordinary course of business of mercantile agent - agent would not supply false invoice if carrying out a transaction it was authorised by principal to carry out - sale not in ordinary course of business of mercantile agent - whether purchaser acted in good faith and in absence of notice of lack of authority to sell - absence of good faith where purchaser suspected that the thing was not altogether right and consciously refrained from making inquiry - s 5 Factors (Mercantile Agents) Act 1923 not satisfied - purchaser did not acquire title Legislation Cited: Factors (Mercantile Agents) Act 1923 Sale of Goods Act 1923 Cases Cited: Tobin v Broadbent [1947] HCA 46; (1947) 75 CLR 378 Sweeney v Howard [2007] NSWSC 852; (2007) 13 BPR 24,381 Oppenheimer v Attenborough & Son [1908] 1 KB 221 Magnussen v Flanagan [1981] 2 NSWLR 926 Associated Midland Corporation v Sanderson Motors Pty Ltd [1983] 3 NSWLR 395 Heap v Motorists' Advisory Agency Limited [1923] 1 KB 577 Oppenheimer v Frazer & Wyatt [1907] 1 KB 519 Kirkpatrick v Kotis [2004] NSWSC 1265; (2004) 62 NSWLR 567 Lysaght Bros & Co Ltd v Falk (1905) 2 CLR 421 Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1993) 115 ALR 411 at [574]; Beach Petroleum NL v Kennedy [1999] NSWCA 408; (1999) 48 NSWLR 1 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Australia Pty Limited (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (1st Defendant) Rakesh Tulshyan (2nd Defendant) Representation: A J Bulley (Plaintiff) Submitting appearance (1st Defendant) G Sirtes SC with D R Meltz (2nd Defendant) Dibbs Barker (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor (1st Defendant) MacGillivrays Solicitors (2nd Defendant) File Number(s): 2009/290650
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate