NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Smith (No 5) [2011] NSWSC 1459 Hearing dates: 17 June 2011 Decision date: 28 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: BUDDIN J Decision: Evidence admitted Catchwords: Criminal law - murder - evidence of expert witness - comparison of footwear patterns on crime scene shoes and footwear of accused Legislation Cited: Evidence Act Cases Cited: Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Louizos v The Queen (2009) 194 A Crim R 223 Mainwaring v R [2009] NSWCCA 207 Parish v The State of Western Australia [2008] WASCA 90 R v Blick (2000) 111 A Crim R 326 R v Le [2000] NSWCCA 49 R v Mundine (2008) 182 A Crim R 302 R v N, GF and N, SG (No 2) [2010] SASC 8 R v Shamouil (2006) 66 NSWLR 228 R v SJRC [2007] NSWCCA 142 R v Suteski (2002) 56 NSWLR 182 R v Tang (2006) 161 A Crim R 377 Rose v R (1993) 69 A Crim R 1 Smith v The Queen (2001) 206 CLR 650 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Regina Darren Paul Smith Representation: Counsel: C Everson (Crown) D Yehia SC (Accused) Solicitors: S Kavanagh (Solicitor) Director of Public Prosecutions Legal Aid Commission File Number(s): 2009/50517
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate