NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cooper v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 258 Hearing dates: 17 and 18 February, 15 April 2011 Decision date: 05 December 2011 Before: Beazley JA at [1]; Hidden J at [258]; R A Hulme J at [261] Decision: Appeal against conviction dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - verdict - appeal against conviction - whether conduct of trial by counsel resulted in miscarriage of justice - trial counsel failed to lead medical evidence of deceased's mental health - trial counsel failed to cross-examine on material in medical records - trial counsel failed to call witnesses - whether appellant lost an opportunity of acquittal that was fairly open to the jury - no reasonable explanation for trial counsel's failure to lead medical evidence and cross-examine on medical records - reasonable explanation for failure to call witnesses - no miscarriage of justice - appeal dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW - joint criminal enterprise - whether trial judge erred in leaving a joint criminal enterprise open to the jury as an alternative basis for liability - no evidence to support a joint criminal enterprise - trial judge wrongly put the alternative case on joint criminal enterprise to the jury
CRIMINAL LAW - verdict - appeal against conviction - directions of trial judge - whether trial judge erred in directions on self-defence and defence of another - whether trial judge erred in directing the jury in relation to admission by witness Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21 Garrett v R [1977] HCA 67; 139 CLR 437 Gilham v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 323; 178 A Crim R 72 HG v R [1999] HCA 2; 197 CLR 414 Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; 52 NSWLR 705 Markby v R [1978] HCA 29; 140 CLR 108 Matusevich v R [1977] HCA 30; 137 CLR 633 McAuliffe v The Queen [1995] HCA 37; 183 CLR 108 Nudd v R [2006] HCA 9; 80 ALJR 614 Osland v R [1998] HCA 75; 197 CLR 316 Paric v John Holland (Constructions) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 58; 59 ALJR 844 R v Carroll [2002] HCA 55; 213 CLR 635 R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 Rogers v R [1994] HCA 42; 181 CLR 251 TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46; 212 CLR 124 Washer v The State of Western Australia [2007] HCA 48 Weiss v R [2005] HCA 81; 224 CLR 300 Texts Cited: Brett, Waller and Williams, Criminal Law, 8th ed Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bradley Cooper (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: T A Game SC, S Buchen (Appellant) D Arnott SC (Respondent) Legal Aid (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2004/2297 Publication restriction: Restricted due to re-trial of Bradley Cooper 2004/2297 to commence on 25 November 2013. Decision under appeal Citation: R v Bradley Douglas Cooper [2005] NSWSC 791 Date of Decision: 2005-09-05 00:00:00 Before: Buddin J File Number(s): SC 2004/46
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate