NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Paul JAMES [2011] NSWDC 185 Decision date: 04 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Cogswell SC DCJ Decision: For the offence of using a carriage service in a way reasonable persons would regard as being offensive I impose a term of imprisonment of 1 year. For the offence of possessing child pornography I impose a term of imprisonment of 4 years. For 1 count of transmitting child pornography over a carriage service I impose a term of imprisonment of 3 years 8 months. For 4 counts of transmitting child pornography material over a carriage service I impose terms of imprisonment of 5 years and 6 months. For 7 counts of transmitting child pornography over a carriage service I impose terms of imprisonment of 5 years and 9 months. For 1 count of transmitting child pornography over a carriage service I impose a term of imprisonment of 6 years. For 1 count of transmitting child pornography over a carriage service I impose a term of imprisonment 6 years and 3 months. Catchwords: CRIME - sentence - child pornography - jury verdict of guilty - Commonwealth offences - one State possess - multiple transmit and one use computer - transmit a more serious instance of that offence - communication with under cover officer acting as 14 year old girl - most Oliver scale 1 but some in each category - general deterrence - no criminal history - custodial sentence necessary - transmit sentences varied according to number of images transmitted - partial accumulation of sentences Legislation Cited: Criminal Code Act 1995 s 474.17(1), s 474.19(1)(a)(iii) Crimes Act 1900 s 19AB, s 23ZD, s 91H(2) Cases Cited: Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525 Hili v The Queen (2010) 85 ALJR 195 R v Booth [2009] NSWCCA 89 R v Gent [2005] NSWCCA 370 R v Oliver [2002] EWCA Crim 2766 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina Paul James Representation: Mr T Phelan for Mr James Ms ME Grimes for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions File Number(s): 2010/154421
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate