NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: CT Money Pty Ltd & Ors v GJ & SG Thompson Pty Limited & Anor [2011] NSWSC 1468 Hearing dates: Wednesday, 2 November 2011 Decision date: 02 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Brereton J Decision: Second cross-claim dismissed with costs Catchwords: SECURITY FOR COSTS - Cross-claimant fails to comply with order for security - cross-defendant applies for dismissal of cross-claim - cross-claimant 'plaintiff' for purposes of (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, (2005), r 41.21 - factors relevant to application for dismissal include time since security ordered, ability of cross-claimant to provide security, extent to which cross-claimant notified of dismissal application, prejudice to cross-defendant if stay continued, impact on court if stay continued, ability of cross-claimant to commence new proceedings and prejudice to cross-claimant - time elapsed since order not insignificant in context where cross-defendant required to prepare for trial - cross-claimant on notice of dismissal application - cross-claimant likely never to be able to fund cross-claim - prejudice to cross-defendant in having to prepare for trial on basis that cross-claim could re-emerge if stay lifted - not appropriate occasion for cross-claimant to cavil with merits of security order - cross-claim dismissed. Legislation Cited: (NSW) Civil Procedure Act, s 3 (CTH) Corporations Act, 2001, s 1335 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules, (2005), r 42.21 Cases Cited: Battenberg v Union Club [2007] NSWSC 265 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank and Others [2002] NSWSC 18 Porter v Gordian Runoff Ltd (No 3) [2005] NSWCA 377 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: CT Money Pty Ltd (first plaintiff) CT Franchises Pty Ltd (second plaintiff) CT Lending Pty Ltd (third plaintiff) GJ & SG Thompson Pty Limited (first defendant/ cross-claimant/respondent to notice of motion) Darranda Pty Limited (second defendant/ cross-defendant/applicant on notice of motion) Representation: Counsel: Mr S Gray (second defendant/applicant on notice of motion) Mr J O'Connor (first defendant/applicant on notice of motion) Solicitors: Kennedy's (second defendant/applicant on notice of motion) Pigott Stinson Lawyers (first defendant/applicant on notice of motion) File Number(s): 2011/274357
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate