NSW Caselaw
Medical Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: IN RE DR A.K.S. [2011] NSWMT 14 Hearing dates: 26 September 2011 Decision date: 29 September 2011 Before: Colefax SC DCJ; Dr Kate Ilbury; Dr Vasco de Carvahlo; Dr Catherine Berglund Decision: Application by doctor to adduce evidence inconsistent with underlying conviction an abuse of process and refused. Catchwords: Abuse of process - Collateral attack on jury verdicts Legislation Cited: Medical Practice Act 1992 (NSW) - repealed Cases Cited: A.K.S. v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 2007 Ziems v The Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (1957) 97 CLR 279 A Solicitor v Council of the Law Society of NSW [2004] 216 CLR 253 Gonzales v Claridades (2003) 58 NSWLR 188 Neil Pearson & Co v The Comptroller General of Customs (1995) 38 NSWLR 443 Hunter v the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police (1982) AC 529 Reichel v McGrath (1889) 14 App Cas 665 Walton v Gardiner (1993) 197 CLR 378 Metropolitan Bank v Pooley (1885) 10 App Cas 210 Rogers v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 251 Batistatos v The Roads and Traffic Authority (2006) HCA 27 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Health Care Complaints Commission (Plaintiff) The Doctor (Defendant) Representation: Ms. E. Brus (Plaintiff) Mr. P. Boulten SC / Mr M. Ainsworth (Defendant) File Number(s): 40020 of 2008 Publication restriction: The name of the medical practitioner is suppressed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate