NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Hedges v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 263 Hearing dates: 26 October 2011 Decision date: 09 December 2011 Before: Beazley JA at [1]; James J at [77]; Fullerton J at [78] Decision: 1. Appeal against conviction dismissed; 2. Grant leave to appeal against sentence; 3. Appeal against sentence allowed; 4. Quash the sentence imposed by the sentencing judge; 5. Order that the appellant be sentenced to a term of imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 15 months commencing on 4 November 2010 and ending on 3 February 2012, on which date the appellant must be released on parole, with an additional term of 15 months ending on 3 May 2013. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against conviction - dangerous driving occasioning death - whether verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence - Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(1) - only inference available from the evidence was that the appellant's actions to overtake vehicle involved a conscious and deliberate decision - no inference consistent with innocence reasonably open on the evidence - appeal against conviction dismissed
CRIMINAL LAW - leave to appeal against sentence - sentencing judge erred in misapplication of guideline judgment in R v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343 - no aggravating features for consideration upon sentencing - judge's sentencing discretion not foreclosed by guideline judgment - sentence quashed and new sentence imposed Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act, 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Cases Cited: Arun v Regina [2010] NSWCCA 214 Burrell v R [2009] NSWCCA 193 Fleming v R [1998] HCA 68; 197 CLR 250 Jiminez v R [1992] HCA 14; 173 CLR 572 Keir v R [2007] NSWCCA 149 M v R [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53; 213 CLR 606 R v Hillier [2007] HCA 13; 228 CLR 618 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209 R v Moffatt [2000] NSWCCA 174; 112 A Crim R 201 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 Regina v Tadman [2001] NSWCCA 225 Regina v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343; 55 NSWLR 252 The Queen v Keenan [2009] HCA 1; (2009) 83 ALJR 243 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dylan Joseph Hedges (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: T Gartelmann (Appellant) J Pickering (Respondent) Ian Byrne Solicitors (Appellant) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): CCA 2009/58392 Decision under appeal Citation: R v Dylan Joseph Hedges Date of Decision: 2010-12-15 00:00:00 Before: Garling DCJ File Number(s): 2009/58392
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate