NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v CB; MP v R [2011] NSWCCA 264 Hearing dates: 27 July 2011 Decision date: 09 December 2011 Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1] Buddin J at [137] Johnson J at [138] Decision: 1. The appeal by the Director of Public Prosecutions is upheld. 2.The order granting a permanent stay to CB is quashed and the matter is remitted to the District Court for trial. 3. The appeal by MP is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL APPEAL - s5F Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) - permanent stay granted in District Court in respect of CB but not MP - possibility of contempt referral gives ACC standing - CB examined by ACC after being charged - information obtained in examination was not disclosed - not open for District Court judge to find decision in ACC v OK [2010] FCAFC 61 was plainly wrong - permanent stay not justified - Crown appeal successful - MP appeal dismissed. Legislation Cited: Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 (Cth) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: A v Boulton [2004] FCA 56; (2004) 204 ALR 598 ABC v Sage [2009] FCA 170;175 FCR 319 Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2009) 176 FCR 203 Australian Crime Commission v OK [2010] FCAFC 61; [2010] 185 FCR 258 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd [1993] HCA 15; 177 CLR 485 Barton v The Queen [1980] HCA 48; 147 CLR 75 at 111 CC v Australian Crime Commission [2005] FCA 754 Clough v Leahy (1904) 2 CLR 139 Commissioner of Police v Tanos (1958) 98 CLR 383 Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme Board of Trustees v Kitching (2004) 139 FCR 272 Dupas v The Queen [2010] HCA 20; 267 ALR 1 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Limited [1993] HCA 74;178 CLR 447 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Indooroopilly Children Services (Qld) Pty Limited [2007] 158 FCR 325 Fleming v White [1981] 2 NSWLR 719 Hamilton v Oades [1989] HCA 21; 166 CLR 486 Hammond v The Commonwealth [1982] HCA 42 Insurance Exchange of Australasia v Dooley (2000) 50 NSWLR 222 Jago v The District Court of NSW [1989] HCA 46; 168 CLR 23 Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408 Mansfield v Australian Crime Commission [2003] FCA 1059; (2003) 132 FCR 251 is Hak Song Ra v Australian Crime Commission [2004] FCA 416; (2004) 138 FCR 51, Loprete v Australian Crime Commission [2004] FCA 1476 McGuinness v AG of Victoria [1940] HCA 6; 63 CLR 73 Mortimer v Brown [1970] HCA 4; 112 CLR 493 NSW Food Authority v Nutricia Australia Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCCA 252; 72 NSWLR 456 OK v Australian Crime Commission [2009] FCA 1038; 259 ALR 507 Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 R v Latif [1996] 1 WLR 104 and R v Grant [2005] 3 WLR 437 R v MG [2007] NSWCCA 57; 69 NSWLR 20 R v Smith (No 1) [2011] NSWSC 725 Secretary, Department of Social Security v Lowe (1999) 92 FCR 26 Sorby v The Commonwealth [1983] HCA 10; 152 CLR 28 Stoddart v Boulton & Anor [2010] FCAFC 89 The Queen v Edwards [2009] HCA 20; 255 ALR 399 Victoria v Australian Building Construction Employees and Builders Labourers Federation [1982] HCA 31; 152 CLR 25 Walton v Gardiner [1993] HCA 77; 177 CLR 378 X v Australian Crime Commission [2004] FCA 1475; (2004) 139 FCR 413 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: CB (Respondent) MP (Appellant) The Crown (Appellant/Respondent) Representation: Counsel: K Chapple SC/D Lee (Cth Crown) Dr J F Bleechmore/N Steel (Respondent - CB) B Walker SC/G Thomas (Appellant - MP) N J Williams SC/M J O'Meara (Australian Crime Commission - applicant for leave to appeal) Solicitors: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Warren McKeon Dickson - Lawyers (Respondent - CB) Konstan Lawyers (Appellant - MP) File Number(s): 2009/30770 (CB) 2009/47599 (CB) 2009/60449 (MP) Decision under appeal Jurisdiction: 9101 Date of Decision: 2011-06-30 00:00:00 Before: Murrell DCJ File Number(s): DC 2009/30770 DC 2009/47599
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate