NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Abbosh v R; Bene v R [2011] NSWCCA 265 Hearing dates: 16 September 2011 (written submissions closed 30 September 2011) Decision date: 09 December 2011 Before: Bathurst CJ at 1 James J at 6 Johnson J at 7 Decision: With respect to the Appellant Abbosh: 1. Appeal against convictions allowed. 2. Convictions and sentences on Counts 2 and 5 are quashed. 3. A new trial is ordered on Counts 2 and 5. With respect to the Appellant Bene: 1. Appeal against convictions allowed. 2. Convictions and sentences on Counts 2 and 5 are quashed. 3. A verdict of acquittal is entered on Count 5. 4. A new trial is ordered on Count 2. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeals - Appellants convicted of two counts of malicious wounding with intent to do grievous bodily harm - Abbosh wounds two persons - claim of self-defence - case against Bene based upon joint criminal enterprise and extended joint criminal enterprise - erroneous failure to exclude prejudicial evidence under s.137 Evidence Act 1995 - misleading directions concerning extended joint criminal enterprise - trial Judge adds unwarranted postscripts on directions concerning good character, right to silence and self-defence - no miscarriage of justice arising from these postscripts - whether verdicts unreasonable or cannot be supported by evidence - conviction of Bene on one count unreasonable - verdict of acquittal on that count - new trials ordered for Bene on remaining count and Abbosh on both counts Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Appeal Rules Cases Cited: R v Salah Bene and Calvin Abbosh [2010] NSWDC 218 R v Clough (1992) 28 NSWLR 396 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37; 196 CLR 297 R v Wilson [2005] NSWCCA 20; 62 NSWLR 346 R v Lisoff [1999] NSWCCA 364 R v GK [2001] NSWCCA 413; 53 NSWLR 317 R v O'Donoghue (1998) 34 A Crim R 397 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Cornwell v The Queen [2007] HCA 12; 231 CLR 260 R v Thompson [2002] NSWCCA 149; 130 A Crim R 24 FB v R [2011] NSWCCA 217 R v Trimboli (1979) 1 A Crim R 73 McAuliffe v The Queen [1995] HCA 37; 183 CLR 108 Gillard v The Queen [2003] HCA 64; 219 CLR 1 RWB v R [2010] NSWCCA 147; 202 A Crim R 209 Colosimo v Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] NSWCA 293 R v Clough (1992) 28 NSWLR 396 Raumakita v R [2011] NSWCCA 126 R v Dang [2001] NSWCCA 321 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; 85 ALJR 1154 Texts Cited: NSW Law Reform Commission, Report 129, "Complicity", December 2010 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Calvin Abbosh (Appellant) Saleh Bene (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Mr SJ Odgers SC (Appellant Abbosh) Mr TA Game SC; Mr D Barrow (Appellant Bene) Mr JH Pickering (Respondent) Sid Hawach & Co (Appellant Abbosh) John B Hajje & Associates (Appellant Bene) Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent) File Number(s): 2009/6185 (Abbosh) 2009/6186 (Bene) Publication restriction: --- Decision under appeal Citation: R v Salah Bene and Calvin Abbosh [2010] NSWDC 218 Before: His Honour Judge Finnane QC File Number(s): 2009/6185 (Abbosh) 2009/6186 (Bene)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate