NSW Caselaw
Administrative Decisions Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bisvic Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADT 293 Hearing dates: 1 July 2011 Decision date: 12 December 2011 Jurisdiction: Revenue Division Before: R Perrignon, Judicial member Decision: The assessments made by the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue in respect of the 2008, 2009 and 2010 tax years are confirmed Catchwords: Land tax - primary production exemption -land used for maintaining horses for the purpose of sale and agistment - whether purpose of profit on a continuous or repeated basis - whether a significant and substantial commercial purpose or character - whether dominant use of the land Legislation Cited: Land Tax Management Act 1956 Taxation Administration Act 1996 Cases Cited: Ball v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] NSWADT 114 Hope v Bathurst City Council No 2 [1979] NSWLR 471 Hope v Bathurst City Council (No 2) (1983) 52 LGRA Jones v Commissioner of Land Tax (NSW) (1980) 11 ATR 98 Leda Manorstead Pty Limited v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2010] 867 McClelland v Goulburn City Council (1976) 35 LGRA 1 Romano v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2011] NSWADT 73 Ryde Municipal Council v Macquarie University (1977) 1 NSWLR 304 Thomas v Commissioner of Taxation (Cth) (1972) 46 ALJR 397 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bisvic Pty Ltd (Applicant) Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (Respondent) Representation: Counsel N Canosa (Applicant) Crown Solicitor (Respondent) File Number(s): 106055
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate