NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Damon JOB v R [2011] NSWCCA 267 Hearing dates: 15 June 2011 Decision date: 16 December 2011 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: McClellan CJ at CL at [1]; Hidden J at [2], Grove AJ at [75] Decision: Leave to appeal granted, appeal allowed, sentences in District Court quashed. Applicant re-sentenced as follows: On each of the charges of obtaining a benefit by deception relating to the Mays Hill tidal flow activities, a fixed term of imprisonment for 12 months, dating from 19 August 2010 and expiring on 18 August 2011; On each of the charges of obtaining a benefit by deception relating to the Rail Corp shutdowns, imprisonment for a fixed term of 12 months, commencing on 19 February 2011 and expiring on 18 February 2012; On each of the charges of corruptly receiving a benefit, imprisonment for a non-parole period of 1 year, commencing on 19 August 2011 and expiring on 18 August 2012, and a balance of term of 2 years, commencing on 19 August 2012 and expiring on 18 August 2014. Direct that applicant be released on parole on 18 August 2012. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - application for leave to appeal against sentence - offences of obtaining benefit by deception, corruptly receiving a benefit - adequacy of discount for pleas of guilty and assistance to authorities - whether sufficient weight given to mental illness - failure to take into account applicant's undertaking to make restitution Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: R v Borkowski [2009] NSWCCA 102, A Crim R 1 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v M [2005] NSWCCA 224 R v Pang (1998) 105 A Crim R 474 R v NP [2003] NSWCCA 195 R v OPA [2004] NSWCCA 464 R v AMT [2005] NSWCCA 151 R v Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92, 172 A Crim R 151 R v Phelan (1993) 66 A Crim R 446 R v Conway [2001] NSWCCA 51, 121 A Crim R177 Stratford v R [2007] NSWCCA 279 Thewlis v R [2008] NSWCCA 176, 186 A Crim R 279 R v Cage [2006] NSWCCA 304 DPP (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194, 205 A Crim R 1 R v Fell [2004] NSWCCA 235 R v Blundell [2008] NSWCCA 63, 70 NSWLR 660 R v Hawker [2001] NSWCCA 148 R v Martin [2005] NSWCCA 190 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Damon Job (applicant) Regina (Crown/respondent) Representation: Counsel C Nash (applicant) V Lydiard (Crown/respondent) Solicitors Reimer Winter Williamson Lawyers (applicant) S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown/respondent) File Number(s): 2009/187991 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2010-09-03 00:00:00 Before: Berman SC DCJ File Number(s): 2009/187991
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate