NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Teresa Nadia Pedulla v Fernando Rene Panetta & Ors (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1533 Hearing dates: 9 December 2011 Decision date: 09 December 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division Before: Pembroke J Decision: See [17] Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY - Statutory construction - Section 129A Real Property Act - clear words fortified by evident purpose and object Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 Real Property Act 1900 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 Cases Cited: Ireland v Retallack & Ors (No 2) [2001] NSWSC 1096 Category: Costs Parties: Teresa Nadia Pedulla - plaintiff Fernando Rene Panetta - first defendant Anna Panetta - second defendant Registrar-General - third defendant Lewis Fineman Yee - fourth defendant Representation: Counsel: D L Williams SC with D A Caspersonn - for the plaintiff G A Sirtes SC with H Altan - for the third defendant L V Gyles SC with Ms Yu (on 9.12.11) - for the fourth defendant Solicitors: Lee and Lyons - for the plaintiff Gavin Ronald Bartier, Solicitor for the Registrar-General, Department of Finance and Services, Legal Services - for the third defendant DLA Piper Australia - for the fourth defendant No appearance for the first and second defendants File Number(s): 2011/00166997
EX TEMPORE Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate