NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: SILLS v R [2011] NSWCCA 271 Hearing dates: 5 December 2011 Decision date: 14 December 2011 Before: Meagher JA at 1 Hoeben J at 2 Rothman J at 66 Decision: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence appeal - plea of guilty to accessory and receiving charges - whether sentencing judge erred in failing to rule on defence objections to Statement of Facts - whether applicant sentenced upon facts which disclosed a more serious offence - no error disclosed. Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Madden v R [2011] NSWCCA 254 Chow v Director of Public Prosecutions (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 R v De Simoni (1981) 147 CLR 383 R v H [2005] NSWCCA 282 Regina v Laurentiu (1992) 63 A Crim R 402 per Wood J at 415-416 Regina v David Alan Lawless (CCA, unreported, 24 June 1994) R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54; (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v Uzabeaga [2000] NSWCCA 381 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Michael Sills - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: W Hunt - Applicant MM Cinque - Respondent Crown B Sandland, Legal Aid Commission - Applicant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Respondent Crown File Number(s): 2009/282912 Decision under appeal Date of Decision: 2011-06-17 00:00:00 Before: Coolahan DCJ File Number(s): 2009/282912
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate