NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kyriakou v Kuzevski & Ors [2011] NSWSC 1541 Hearing dates: Friday, 25 November 2011 Decision date: 25 November 2011 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Duty List Before: White J Decision: Refer to paras [26]-[29] of judgment. Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT - residential tenancy agreement - where occupant of residential premises evicted - application for order allowing residence at premise for period of seven days - whether residential tenancy agreement under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 - parties cannot enter into agreement for purpose of preventing operation of Residential Tenancies Act 2010 - serious question to be tried that occupant a tenant under fixed term residential tenancy agreement that could only be terminated in accordance with s 84, Residential Tenancies Act 2010 - balance of convenience favours allowing occupant back into possession of premises for seven days - occupant allowed back into possession of premises for seven days on undertakings to vacate after seven days, pay outstanding rent and not to damage premises Legislation Cited: Residential Tenancies Act 2010 Consumer, Trader & Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Kyriakou (Plaintiff) John Kuzevski (1st Defendant) Luba Kuzevski (2nd Defendant) Naum Kuzevski (3rd Defendant) Sue Hetherington (4th Defendant) Representation: Plaintiff - in person 1st Defendant - in person N/a File Number(s): 2011/382203
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate