NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gloria Haklany v Joe Gittany & Ors [2011] NSWSC 1549 Hearing dates: 24 & 25 November 2011 Decision date: 25 November 2011 Before: Slattery J Decision: Order for provision made. Legacy awarded to plaintiff in the sum of $197,000. Catchwords: SUCCESSION - Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) - single asset in estate, a debt - testator had six children, four sons and two daughters - daughters left out of will - one daughter makes a claim under Family Provision Act - whether order for provision should be made in favour of daughter. Legislation Cited: Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Cases Cited: Anderson v Teboneris [1990] VR 527 Singer v Berghouse (1993) 114 ALR 521 Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 Young & Grainger v Outtrim [2011] NSWSC 391 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Plaintiff:- Gloria Haklany First Defendant:- Joe Gittany Second Defendant:- Charles Gittany Third Defendant:- Anthony Gittany Fourth Defendant:- Gittany Constructions Pty Ltd Fifth Defendant:- Julie Khouzame Representation: Plaintiff:- J.E.Armfield First Defendant:- Joe Gittany Second - Fourth Defendants:- D.Ash Plaintiff:- George Elias, Elias Gates & Associates First Defendant:- in person Second - Fourth Defendant:- Joe Weller, Joe Weller & Associates File Number(s): 2010/57166 Publication restriction: No.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate