NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Walter Elliott Holdings Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council [2011] NSWLEC 1383 Hearing dates: 19 December 2011 Decision date: 19 December 2011 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: Development modification: placement of additional fill material to create higher building platform, land situated in flood - liable area, drainage easement Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Tweed Local Environmental Plan 2000 Tweed Shire Development Control Plan Cases Cited: Dogild Pty Ltd v Warringah Council [2008] NSWLEC 53 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Walter Elliott Holdings Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Tweed Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel Mr C Gough (Applicant)
Mr S Simmington (Respondent) Solicitors Storey & Gough (Applicant)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s): 10924 of 2011
Judgment
Background 1This appeal was lodged against council's refusal of a s96 application to modify a development consent to increase the amount of filling on the site to form a building platform for a new dwelling at 6 Creek Street, Hastings Point. The land is situated in a flood-liable area. 2The original three bedroom, two storey dwelling was approved with a ground floor habitable level of 2.7 m AHD and no filling. A subsequent modification was granted to allow placement of 400 mm of fill on the site and to change the design to a 'concrete slab on ground'. 3When the filling was undertaken an additional depth of approximately 300mm was placed on the site, together with the fill covering a larger area. Consequently, the current application is to regularise this additional filling associated retaining wall and dish drain. 4As the property is low-lying and backs onto a creek that is flood-liable, the application was refused on the basis that the fill would not preserve overland flow paths and likely cause adverse impacts in the local area. A number of objections were lodged against the proposal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate