NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Roberts v Blue Mountains City Council [2012] NSWLEC 2 Hearing dates: 8 August 2011 Decision date: 17 January 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pepper J Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: APPEAL: appeal against the council's refusal to be satisfied that deferred commencement conditions of a development consent had been complied with - whether the consent had already lapsed - consent was effective but not operative until the deferred commencement conditions were complied with - whether the deferred commencement conditions had been complied with - deferred commencement conditions not complied with - appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 ss 80, 83, 95, 91, 97, Sch 6 cl 111 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 95 Environmental Planning Legislation Amendment Act 2006, Sch 1, s 3, cl 41 Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 17(d) Rural Fires Act 1997, s 100B Cases Cited: Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Ko-veda Holiday Park Estate Ltd [2009] NSWCA 160; (2009) 167 LGERA 395 Bezzina Developers Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2006] NSWLEC 175; (2006) 146 LGERA 249 Boral Resources Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 39; (2003) 124 LGERA 90 Botany Bay City Council v SAAB Corp Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 308 CSR Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2001] NSWLEC 221; (2001) 117 LGERA 77 House of Peace Pty Ltd v Bankstown City Council [2000] NSWCA 44; (2000) 48 NSWLR 498 Rich v Lennox Palms Estate Pty Ltd [2010] NSWCA 242 Roberts v Blue Mountains City Council [2005] NSWLEC 699 S J Connelly Pty Ltd v Ballina Shire Council [2010] NSWLEC 151 Westfield Management Limited v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited [2006] NSWCA 245 Wingecarribee Shire Council v Pancho Properties Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 271; (2001) 117 LGERA 104 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mr Ken Roberts (Applicant) Blue Mountains City Council (Respondent) Representation: Mr I J Hemmings (Applicant) Mr T Cork (Solicitor) (Respondent) Coode & Corry Solicitors (Applicant) McPhee Kelshaw Solicitors (Respondent) File Number(s): 10150 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate