NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The City of Sydney v Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Limited & Anor [2012] NSWSC 10 Hearing dates: 16/9/2011, 31/1/2012 Decision date: 01 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Equity Division - Commercial List Before: Einstein J Decision: See paragraph 92 Catchwords: ORDERS - Final orders reflecting reasons for judgment in The City of Sydney v Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd EVIDENCE - decision on admissibility of proposed tender by defendants. Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Cases Cited: Autodesk Inc v Dyason [No.2] (1993) 176 CLR 300 Council of the City of Sydney v Goldspar Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 568 The City of Sydney v Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Limited & Anor [2011] NSWSC 831 The City of Sydney v Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Limited & Anor [2011] NSWSC 942 The City of Sydney v Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Limited & Anor [2011] NSWSC 1214 Category: Consequential orders Parties: The City of Sydney (Plaintiff) Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Limited (First Defendant) Moses Edward Obeid (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Jucovic QC, Mr S Climpson, Mr C Bova (Plaintiff) Mr S Couper QC, Mr J Gooley, Mr R Higgins (Defendants) Solicitors: Holding Redlich (Plaintiff) Colin Biggers & Paisley (Defendants) File Number(s): 2009/00298673 & 2010/0085353
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate