NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: North Western Surveys Pty Limited v Penrith City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1017 Hearing dates: 6, 7, 8 July and 2, 3, 4, 9 August 2011 Decision date: 30 January 2012 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: (1)The appeal is upheld. (2)Development consent is granted to DA 11/0123 for the subdivision of property at 159 -169 Caddens Road Kingswood NSW into 71 residential lots and 1 residual lot, roads and detention basin subject to the conditions in annexure A. (3)The exhibits are returned. Catchwords: Development consent - appeal against conditions imposed on a development consent for the subdivision of vacant land into 71 residential allotments and 1 residual lot subject to conditions to provide facilities and services some funded by a condition under s 94 of the EPA Act 1979 (subject to a s 94E Ministerial Direction which caps monetary contributions at $30K) and some provided by way of condition under s 80A(1)(f) and 81A(3) of the EPA Act - are the conditions reasonable and if so do they relate to the development Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Penrith Development Control Plan 2006 Penrith Local Environmental Plan (Caddens) 2009 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan No 20 - Hawkesbury Nepean River Cultural Facilities Development Contribution Plan District Open Space Facilities Development Contributions Plan WELL Precinct Development Contribution Plan 2008 Cases Cited: Cavasinni Constructions Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2010] NSWLEC 65; (2010) 173 LGERA 456 Fairfield City Council v N & S Olivieri Pty Limited [2003] NSWCA 41 Goldberg v Waverley Council [2007] 156 LGERA 27 Maitland City Council v Anambah Homes Pty Ltd (2005) 147 LGERA 234 Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Sydney [2011] NSWCA 17 Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578 at 697G Sydney City Council v Ipoh Pty Limited (2006) 149 LEGERA 329 Category: Principal judgment Parties: North Western Surveys Pty Limited (Applicant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate