NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Provident Capital Limited v Ross Leslie Norton [2012] NSWSC 17 Hearing dates: 31 January 2012 Decision date: 01 February 2012 Before: Adamson J Decision: (a) the defendants' amended notice of motion filed on 7 October 2011 be dismissed; (b) the stay of execution of the writ of possession granted on 11 October 2011 is lifted; and (c) the costs of the notice of motion are reserved, pending further argument. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to set aside a consent order - whether judgment given against good faith - whether sufficient cause to set aside order Legislation Cited: UCPR 36.15, 36.16 Contracts Review Act 1980 Cases Cited: Coles v Burke (1987) 10 NSWLR 429 Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer v Detailed Flooring Pty Limited [2010] NSWSC 1056 Category: Interlocutory applications Parties: Provident Capital Limited Ross Leslie Norton Representation: B K Nolan - Respondent/Plaintiff L Paraska - Applicant/Defendants Tiernan Lawyers - Respondent/Plaintiff A R Conolly & Company - Applicant/Defendants File Number(s): 2011/00083334
Judgment
Background to the application 1The plaintiff is the mortgagee of the defendants' residence ( the Property ) by reason of a mortgage granted by the defendants on 1 April 2010 ( the Mortgage ). 2Consent judgment was entered for possession of the Property and for costs on 13 April 2011. On 7 September 2011, the plaintiff filed a notice of motion for a writ of possession and, on 9 September 2011, the Court issued a writ of possession. 3The defendants move on Amended Notice of Motion filed on 7 October 2011 to set aside the consent judgment, either pursuant to UCPR 36.15 or UCPR 36.16. On 11 October 2011 the Court ordered that there be a stay of execution of the writ of possession until further order. On 13 October 2011, the hearing of the plaintiff's notice of motion was listed for 31 January 2012.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate