NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Elskaf [2012] NSWSC 21 Hearing dates: 05/12/2011 Decision date: 03 February 2012 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Garling J Decision: (a) Appeal allowed. (b) The order made on 5 August 2011 dismissing the proceedings is set aside. (c) The order made on 5 August 2011 with respect to costs is quashed. (d) The proceedings are remitted to the Local Court to be dealt with by a magistrate, other than O'Shane LCM. (e) The first defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs. (f) The first defendant is to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if otherwise entitled. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - Penalty notice for red traffic signal offence - Proceedings dismissed in Local Court as no prima facie case established - Denial of procedural fairness - Magistrate peremptorily refused to permit prosecution to call two police witnesses - Error of law in ruling prosecution had not established prima facie case - Statements that witness evidence is unreliable without analysis as to why does not discharge judicial obligation to give reasons - Order dismissing proceedings set aside and new hearing before new magistrate ordered Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Evidence Act 1995 Road Rules 2008 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Supreme Court Act 1970 Cases Cited: Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden [2001] NSWCA 32; 122 A Crim R 166 Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions v Acevedo [2009] NSWSC 653 Cox v Salt (1994) 12 WAR 12 Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Illawarra Cashmart Pty Ltd [2006] NSWSC 343; 67 NSWLR 402 Director of Public Prosecutions v Wunderwald [2004] NSWSC 182 Doney v The Queen [1990] HCA 51; 171 CLR 207 DPP (Cth) v Neamati [2007] NSWSC 746 DPP v Lee [2006] NSWSC 270 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Haw Tua Tau v Public Prosecutor [1982] 1 AC 136 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association [1983] HCA 17; 151 CLR 288 May v O'Sullivan [1955] HCA 38; 92 CLR 654 Michael Wilson & Partners Limited v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48 R v Bilick (1984) 36 SASR 321 R v Murphy (1985) 4 NSWLR 42 R v Prasad (1979) 23 SASR 161 R v Serratore [1999] NSWCCA 377; 48 NSWLR 101 Smith v NSW Bar Association [1992] HCA 36; 176 CLR 256 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 Whitehorn v The Queen [1983] HCA 42; 152 CLR 657 Zanetti v Hill [1962] HCA 62; 108 CLR 433 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (P) Representation: I Bourke (P) S Fraser (D2) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (P) V L Macri Lawyers (D1) File Number(s): 2011/281797
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate