NSW Caselaw
Industrial Relations Commission New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Inspector Doug Rolland v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWIRComm 174 Hearing dates: 12 December 2011 Decision date: 14 December 2011 Jurisdiction: Industrial Court of NSW Before: Kavanagh J Decision: 1. I find the defendant guilty. 2. 2. The defendant is fined in the sum of $170,000 with a moiety to the WorkCover Authority of New South Wales. 3. The defendant shall pay the prosecutor's costs. As to the quantification of costs, I will hear the parties on this issue in the event no agreement is reached. Leave to relist at short notice. Catchwords: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY - breach under s 8(1) - amended application for order - guilty plea - unsafe ceiling area used for storage - ceiling collapsed and employee injured - warning sign and guard rail installed nonetheless area still used for storage - no safe system of work - failure to properly instruct employees - failure to properly restrict access to unsafe area - defendant aware of risk - failure to warn of risk - failure to ensure employees had no access to known danger - foreseeable element - serious risk - general and specific deterrence - mitigating factors - defendant contributes significantly to employment in NSW and nationally - commitment to workplace safety to be commended - effective first aid system - appropriate remorse and contrition expressed - discount for plea - previous convictions - co-operated with prosecutor - penalty to reflect seriousness of offence - penalty - costs Legislation Cited: Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Cases Cited: Capral Aluminium Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71; (2000) 49 NSWLR 610 Inspector Olive v Transfield Pty Ltd [2001] NSWIRComm 295 Inspector Rolland v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2011] NSWIRComm 126 Lawrenson Diecasting Pty Ltd v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Ch'ng) (1999) 90 IR 464 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 215 ALR 213; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Morrison v Powercoal Pty Limited [2003] NSWIRComm 416; (2003) 130 IR 364 R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; (2000) 115 A Crim R 104 Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Ch'ng) v ACI Operations Pty Limited (unreported decision of Schmidt J dated 25 February 1994) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Inspector Doug Rolland (Prosecutor) Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: M K Scott of counsel (Prosecutor) P E McDonald SC (Defendant) WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Prosecutor) Sparke Helmore Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): IRC 1259 of 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate